New fav thing: GQ’s slideshow of FORTY-ONE ‘sexy women at SXSW’ who definitely didn’t know they were being photographed.
GQ: Enabling creepers since 1931.
You kinda know SXSW is over / hipsters are over when GQ starts reporting on them. Which isn’t a gig against GQ, more than fact that it’s weird for middle-aged stockbroker/marketing bros to suddenly know all about the ins and outs of Dan Deacon or some shit like that. What’s next – an article called “Top Ten Places Not To Shower”?
KEEP THE SCENE ALIIIIIIVE, BRO.
GQ, dont make me abandon my deep v’s. i love them, but just dont wanna be stalked.
If there is one festival where you really DON’T see good style, it’s SXSW, and I have no idea what the point of this article was - other than to creep on hot chicks. A better use of time would have been to profile people doing things and making an impact at SXSW… [disclaimer, I love you GQ, but I really just don’t get this].




![canarycoal:
nedhepburn:
modernprimate:
interweber:
New fav thing: GQ’s slideshow of FORTY-ONE ‘sexy women at SXSW’ who definitely didn’t know they were being photographed.
GQ: Enabling creepers since 1931.
You kinda know SXSW is over / hipsters are over when GQ starts reporting on them. Which isn’t a gig against GQ, more than fact that it’s weird for middle-aged stockbroker/marketing bros to suddenly know all about the ins and outs of Dan Deacon or some shit like that. What’s next – an article called “Top Ten Places Not To Shower”?
KEEP THE SCENE ALIIIIIIVE, BRO.
GQ, dont make me abandon my deep v’s. i love them, but just dont wanna be stalked.
If there is one festival where you really DON’T see good style, it’s SXSW, and I have no idea what the point of this article was - other than to creep on hot chicks. A better use of time would have been to profile people doing things and making an impact at SXSW… [disclaimer, I love you GQ, but I really just don’t get this].](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m17e5kA1BM1qz7s6jo1_500.png)


